|
In
the 1960s, Till and McCulloch and colleagues provided
genetic marking evidence that in mouse bone marrow there are
rare cells that can form myeloerythroid colonies in the
spleens of irradiated mice, some of which contain cells that
can self-renew.6
- 7 It
was reasonable to propose the existence of HSCs from these
experiments,8
- 9
although later experiments showed that the colony-forming
cells were defined myeloid progenitors.10
The proposal that HSCs probably exist set the
stage for prospective isolation of these cells.
The
isolation of HSCs required several conceptual and technical
advances, including monoclonal antibodies to cell surface
proteins,11
high-speed multiparameter cell sorters,12
and the establishment of clonogenic assays for all
blood cell lineages.13
- 17 In
a preclinical setting, the cells were shown to regenerate
the blood-forming system of lethally irradiated mice.1
,17
These assays eventually led to the prospective isolation of
clonogenic mouse1
and human18
HSC populations that self-renew and include in
their clonal progeny all blood cell types.19
- 20
The downstream progenitors in the hematopoietic lineage in
mouse and humans have also been isolated.3
- 4 ,21
- 23
The
same method was used to isolate a human central nervous
system stem cell (hCNS SC) population24
which, at the single-cell level, could give rise
to spheres of neural cells that can differentiate to
oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and neurons, as well as
self-renewed hCNS SCs.25
Implantation of these cells into the lateral
ventricles of newborn immunodeficient mice brains led to
site-appropriate seeding of neurogenic zones (subventricular
zone of the lateral ventricles and the dentate gyrus of the
hippocampus25
) by these stem cells, where they self-renew for
the life of the mouse. Their daughter cells migrate to sites
where they differentiate into the neural cell types and the
specific tissue architecture specified by the mouse brain
regions they occupy.
These results revealed an unexpected aspect of stem cell
biology—the cues for self-renewal, site-specific migration,
and site-appropriate differentiation and placement into the
microarchitecture, at least for brain stem cells, appear
largely to be conserved between mouse and humans.
This becomes important in studying preclinical capacities of
stem cell therapies, for understanding the behavior of brain
cancer stem cells, and for neurobiology. Investigators can
now study human neuronal cells in the context of the mouse
brain, which should be valuable in the fields of
neurodevelopment, function, and perhaps neuropathologies.
These neural stem cells can be genetically modified,
allowing the opportunity to study particular genes in human
neural cells in situ for their role in neurological
functions.
Stem cell isolation is now about 17 years
old, yet only a few tissue stem cells from mouse or humans
have been prospectively isolated to date, and really only
HSCs have been transplanted in humans to regenerate any
tissue. Yet tissue and organ transplants have shown the
need, and the feasibility of regenerative medicine, and so
the field has a long way to go before we understand and
exploit their potential.
Most
clinical hematopoietic cell transplants now use mobilized
peripheral blood (MPB), which results in rapid (10- to
13-day) engraftment; this is due to increased numbers of
HSCs in MPB vs marrow.26
- 27
Unfortunately, because the clinical community has accepted
the term “stem cell transplants” to include a variety of
hematopoietic transplants, only the most savvy oncologist
will recognize the difference between unpurified mobilized
blood cell transplants and HSC transplants. The following
proposed terminology may help clarify this problem: all
transplants could be called HCT for
hematopoietic cell transplantation. Mobilized peripheral
blood could be called MPB; bone
marrow, BMT; umbilical cord blood,
UCB; CD34+-enriched
transplants, CD34 HCTs; and true stem
cell transplants by their identifying characteristics, eg,
CD34+Thy1+HSC. That way the reader
can know what was actually done, rather than requiring
credentials in stem cell biology.
For
treatment of patients with cancer with their own
hematopoietic cells following myeloablative chemotherapy,
only purified HSCs were free of cancer cells,28
and these were used in several clinical trials.29
- 32
In
the first human transplantations between HLA-matched
siblings, the donor T cells that are present at high levels
in bone marrow and MPB (and UCB) recognize the host as
foreign and carry out a potentially lethal graft-vs-host
disease (GVHD). In mice, rapid and sustained engraftment
with pure HSCs could be accomplished without GVHD.33
- 36 In
allogeneic transplants between major histocompatability
complex (MHC)–matched (HLA in humans, H2 in mice) but
otherwise genetically distinct pairs, the main requirement
for successful engraftment is temporary lymphoablation of T
cells.33
,35
Even unirradiated immunodeficient mice can achieve 0.1% to
1% donor cells with HSC transplants (D. Bhattacharya, D.
Rossi, D. Bryder, I.L. Weissman, unpublished data, 2005).
But when the donor expresses unshared MHC alleles, one must
also eliminate host natural killer cells,35
,37
which can kill or reject tissue cells.38
In mice monoclonal antibodies that eliminate host
natural killer cells are essential for partial or unmatched
HSC or HCT engraftment. Using sublethal irradiation plus
anti-T and anti–natural killer antibodies, a “safe” regimen,
mice can be transplanted with pure HSCs and be lifelong
chimeras without host rejection of the graft or GVHD.33
- 35
Purified hematopoietic progenitors can also be useful in
particular circumstances. For example, mice exposed to
murine cytomegalovirus, Aspergillus
fumigata, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa
in the immediate post-HSC transplant period die rapidly
because their immune defenses are weak. Cotransplantation of
common lymphoid progenitors with HSCs blocks murine
cytomegalovirus mortality, even if the common lymphoid
progenitors are from fully allogeneic donors.39
Similarly, cotransplantation of common myeloid and
granulocyte-monocyte progenitors precludes lethality with
Aspergillus or
Pseudomonas, again even if the donor is fully
allogeneic.40
In
another example, whole body just-lethal irradiation or
exposure to myeloablating chemicals is possible through
neglect, intention, and war. The only sure way to be saved
from doses of radiation that cause hematopoietic failure,
but not irreversible gut damage, is to be transplanted with
sufficient numbers of HSCs, requiring some kind of HLA
match. However, some progenitors in mice can be
radioprotective until the rare surviving host HSCs can
regenerate the system.10
While hematopoietic regeneration is a well-developed field,
CNS regeneration is still only experimental. Given that
human CNS stem cells engraft and migrate widely in
site-appropriate manners in immunodeficient mouse brains
(and presumably human brains), several experimental models
of neural repair are ongoing. Patients and mice with
lysosomal storage diseases, such as Batten disease, undergo
both systemic and neural degeneration. Provision of the
missing enzymes systemically can result in uptake of the
enzymes by diseased cells in the body, but not the brain,
and ameliorate systemic disease. Transplantation of hCNSSC–derived
populations into mice affected with Batten disease results
in amelioration of the neurodegeneration in all parts of the
brain.41
Compression injuries of the spinal cord often result in
paralysis following local inflammatory events, and among the
pathological hallmarks are areas of cord demyelination.42
Transplantation of hCNS SCs/neurospheres into
immunodeficient mice that had a controlled crush injury at
T9 about 9 days after the injury led to cell
engraftment–dependent recovery of hindlimb paralysis and
coordination.42
The engraftment was mainly oligodendrocytic,
resulting in effective remyelination, and sustained presence
of the graft was required for sustained recovery.42
In these 2 examples neuroprotection was
afforded by injected stem cells and depended on their
ability to differentiate, migrate appropriately, and
function. It is yet to be determined whether regeneration of
neural circuits by replacement with cells derived from CNS
SCs can occur, and of course, it is yet to be determined
which neurodegenerative diseases sustain neuron loss by
direct effects on the neurons vs their nurturing
environments.
When
HSCs engraft in fully myeloablated/lymphoablated mice, the
blood-forming and immune systems are largely, if not
completely, derived from the donor. Donor cells that enter
the thymus give rise to T cells as well as donor-derived
antigen-presenting dendritic cells. The dendritic cells,
along with the host thymic medullary epithelial cells,
delete developing T cells with reactivity to self-proteins
that could be expressed in any tissue or organ from donor or
host. Thus these HSC chimeras produce T-cell populations
that cannot make immune reactions against donor or host but
are capable of making other protective immune reactions for
the host. As a result these reconstituted mice are
permanently transplantation tolerant of grafts of any cell,
tissue, or organ from the HSC donor.37
Tolerance induction for tissue and organ grafts should
eventually be followed by cotransplantation of HSC- and
tissue/organ-specific stem cells from the same donor source.34
,37
This might be achieved not only from living donors but
eventually from classic embryonic stem cell lines or from
donor-specific nuclear transfer stem cell lines.43
- 45
These possibilities could usher in the era
of regenerative medicine, in which curative intent
regeneration of diseased organs and tissues can be achieved
with stem cells, rather than chronic support with drug
therapies. However, thus far the only cell of choice for
these regenerative medicine therapies are the self-renewing
tissue stem cells rather than more transient progenitors or
actual mature, functional cells.
|